The Boeing 737 is the worlds most successful plane. If you have flown anywhere it is more than likely you have been on the world most widely used jet, with over 12,000 being ordered over the last fifty years.
There are thirteen different models and currently, Boeing produces a new one every 10 days.
But it looks like another contender has come to take Boeing’s crown, the Airbus A220.
Airbus previously rolled out a competitor to the Boeing 737, the Airbus A320, and has had plenty of success in the market. However, this new jet could sneak in and cause a major upset against the industry giant.
Featured Video:
Just like in our previous articles where we prove which is better, the Boeing 777x vs Airbus A350 and 787 Dreamliner or Long Haul Airbus A350, we are looking for either a clear winner or how each jet has a distinct performance over the other in various categories.
Why are we comparing these two planes?
The new Airbus A220-300 is new on the market and incorporates other design principles not found in other Airbus planes. As it comes from Bombardier in Canada (Previously called the CS series, but now in a 49% joint venture partnership with Airbus it has a new name), they have different expertise, materials, technology and more.
Plus, as icing on the cake, Boeing previously tried to embargo the A220 from being sold to carriers. It required legal help from Airbus to get it through to their customers. Now for this underdog, it’s personal.
How are they selling?
Recently, Delta revealed its first A220-100 and how it will have another 90 in the skies over the next five years. This has also followed reports of JetBlue placing a large order and Moxy, the new startup from the ex-founder of JetBlue, placing an order. So far, over 400 have been ordered.
The Boeing 737 absolutely destroys those numbers with over 12,000 orders.
Which two planes will be tested?
Naturally, there are 13 different 737 models, and 2 (and a half) A220 models. In the principle of fairness, we will be looking at the most popular Boeing 737-800 vs the A220-300, based on having almost equivalent passenger numbers.
There is, of course, bigger and small variations of both, from smaller 737’s to bigger A220-500’s.
We will be comparing them to several different items found in the list below. We will take the perspective of an Airline looking for the most band for their buck. This means whilst an airline might have a cool feature (Like the big windows on an A220) it does not directly lead to more profit thus will not be included.
Let’s get to it!
Boeing 737 vs Airbus A220
| Model | 737-800 | A220-300 |
| Cockpit crew | Two | Two |
| Seating, 2-class | 160 | 130 |
| Seating, 1-class | 175 | 160 |
| Overall length | 102–138 ft (31–42 m) | 127 ft 0 in / 38.7 m |
| Wing | 112 ft 7 in (34.32 m) | 115 ft 1 in / 35.1 m |
| Overall height | 41 ft (12 m) | 37 ft 8 in / 11.5 m |
Fuselage | 148 inches (3.8 m) | 12 ft 2 in / 3.7 m |
| Cabin width | 139.2 inches (3.54 m) | 129.0 in / 3.28 m |
| Fuel capacity[194] | 20,100L | 17,213 L |
Cargo capacity | 882–1,373 cu ft, 25.0–38.9 m3 | 1,116 cu ft / 31.6 m³ |
| Speed (Cruise) | Mach 0.82 (473 kn; 876 km/h) | Mach .78 (447 kn; 829 km/h) typical |
| Takeoff Runway | 2,290–2,650 m | 6,200 ft / 1,890 m |
| Range | 2,935–3,010 nmi | 3678 nmi |
| Engines (2×) | CFM56-3 series | Pratt & Whitney PW1500G |
| Maximum thrust[194] | 20,000–23,500 / lbf 89–105 kN | 21,000-23,300 lbf / 93.4-103.6 kN |
Passenger Seating: It seems that the Boeing 737 can just fit in a few more passengers than the Airbus 220. More paying passengers, more revenue. Winner: Boeing 737
A possible stretch in the future might make the Airbus 220 more competitive, but it remains to be seen if it would encroach on the Airbus A320 business.
Cabin Size: The Boeing 737 has a bigger cabin than the A220, and can fit more passengers and cargo on board. the A220 is five seats across and the 737 is six seats across. It’s only 10 inches wider and thus room enough to get a win. Winner: Boeing 737
Seat Size: Surprisingly, there are reports that the newer 737’s have smaller seats than the A220. In an effort to cram as many people on board the 737 as possible, the A220 comes out ahead, with 1 inch wider seats, and up to 2 inches more in pitch (In Economy). However, this is up to the airline and it’s not fair to rate a plane based on their fit out. After all, we hear Ryanair is still chasing after those stand-up seats. Draw
Cargo Capacity: The Boeing 737 has more cargo capacity on board due to being a bigger plane. This is fairly tight, however, there is a clear winner. Winner: Boeing 737
Speed and Cruise: Turns out, the bigger plane can actually fly significantly faster. We did not expect this going in but the Airbus is rather slower than the Boeing 737. Fast speed means more turnarounds and more flights in a day. Winner: Boeing 737
Range: But, here is where Airbus A220 takes the fight back. The Airbus has a range of almost 2,000 more kilometers than the Boeing 737. This means hundreds of more routes and way more versatility when it comes to route planning.
In fact, it’s because of this large range that some new airlines are using this jet to build a new flight business model! Winner: Airbus A220
Takeoff Runway: The smaller plane requires a shorter runway. This is no surprise but does mean the Airbus can fly to more airports than the Boeing 737.
Let’s talk about Fuel Efficiency
You may have noticed that the Airbus A220 carries far less fuel than the Boeing 737 and that the range of the Airbus is significantly more. This is evidence that the Airbus A220 is far more fuel efficient, and thus may actually be far cheaper to run than any Boeing 737.
This would make Airlines far more attracted in buying the A220 over the Boeing 737 as the price of fuel goes up.
What about cost?
Now, if we were an airline and wanted to buy one of these jets, which is the better deal?
Boeing 737: Between $51.5 million and $87 million US, on average
A220 / CS300: $89.5 million US
The Boeing 737 is significantly cheaper, that you can actually buy two (with discounts) for the price of one A220. That may instantly negate any fuel savings made by an airline. This is simply because Boeing has a mass production line that produces hundreds of these planes a year. Airbus and Bombardier would need a similar setup (And similar orders) to even compete with their A220.
Which is the better plane?
As with all answers to this question, it depends what you want the jet for. If you are flying larger amounts of passengers rapidly and need a reliable and versatile jet, that has a proven record and is cheaper to buy, then the Boeing 737 is the way to go.
However, many airlines actually lease planes and may not care about how much it costs, but which is cheaper to run. This is the A220, with its bigger range and fuel efficiency makes it an excellent contender for the Boeing 737 killer.
If Airbus and Bombardier could make a CS-500 / A220-500 version that could seat 160-200 passengers, and get the price low enough, then Boeing would be very worried indeed.
Post Script: Why not compare Boeing 737 MAX 8 vs Airbus A220/CS300
Many commentators have written in asking why don’t we compare a new plane (A220-300) with Boeing 737 Max 8. After all, the Boeing 737 Max 8 has the advantage of new technology, new engineering and has an equal astonishing large amount of orders (Over 4,000 for the 737 Max varieties).
However, the above principles still very much apply. The newer 737 Max 8 can hold up to 210 passengers, flies a little further in range than the A220 (In the order of a few hundred kilometers) but requires 7,000 more liters of fuel to do so. It’s a bigger plane and would be more appropriate to rival the A320 rather than the A220. The A22 0 is cheaper to run… but the newer Boeing 737 max 8 may have enough extra passengers on board to justify the extra fuel.
What do you think? Do you like the 737 or the A220? Let us know in the comments.
The A220 is not a competitor to the 737. While it does compete with the 737-7, the A320 remains the 737’s primary competitor. It is a totally unfair comparison. Also, I can say that while the 737 is better for the airlines the A220 is far more comfortable and offers a much better experience for the passenger.
I totally agree Airbus is in a bit of a problem with having both the A220 and the A320 on the books. They both operate well against the 737 line up.
If it ain’t Boeing, I ain’t going!!!
Good luck getting there.
Well…it is Boeing that isnt going! Goodnight ‘MAX’
Then Dont go.
I have mixed feelings about this. I consider all Airbuses POS because the computer has total control, and that has lead to several crashes that shouldn’t have happened (AirFrance 447, for example. Seriously, who thought it was a good idea to have no stick feedback? Dumb AF). HOWEVER, it seems like Boeing is headed toward favoring our computer overlords but can’t even do it correctly (737 MAX). Maybe it’s because I grew up flying, but I just don’t trust ANY aircraft where your stick isn’t actually attached to anything- just a bunch of electronics that can give you false warnings… Read more »
If its Boeing I ain’t going. So there.
In particular, if its’ a 737 Max 8 Dude. In that case, you ain’t going anywhere until August 2020 at the earliest.
Maybe it is now after 2 crashes in 5 months.
These metrics aren’t there greatest. For example, comparing cargo size just based on more = better is meaningless when they’re different class planes. Also, there’s no planned A220-500 right now.
And honestly, as much as I’d like to see one, I don’t think there will be an A220-500. It competes too much with the Airbus A320 range…
But then you hear the rumors about the new Boeing plane with Embraer and anything is possible.
The A220 can fly at the same speed and altitudes as the 737, mach .82 and 41,000 feet. Comparing the B737 to the A220 is like comparing an old blackberry phone with an Iphone X. Yes they both make calls and send texts, but the iphone X is much more advanced, of course it is going to cost more because it can do so much more. The B737 was designed in the 60’s and while it has been updated it still retains many of the same characteristics from its original design. The A220 is a clean slate design so has… Read more »
Just because the c-series newer doesn’t make the c-series better. The c-series is a regional jet at heart and hasn’t really found a buyer.
Phones are not the same as planes. This is a bad analogy. Planes are engines and metal with tiny amounts of electonics while phones are batteries and electronics.
The c-series had to be bought by airbus and still hasn’t found a niche
The only reason Airbus bought the share in the A220 is because Boeing made a complaint to the US federal government about unfair competition from the C300. Bombardier sold a share of the plane to Airbus and they will build it in the US for the American market. Another example of Boeing having the ear of the WH. With the MAX failures it will be interesting to see where this all ends up.
Looks like you got your model statistics from the wrong column in Wikipedia. Also, the -800 is the old version of the 737, with the new version, the Max-8, with even better economics & comfort.
We actually got them from the correct source. Yes, I think another look with Max 8 might be in order, but I think the outcome will be the same.
What a ridiculous article. Nothing more than click bait. These two planes don’t compete. When you list the spec of the 737 you list a range of lengths etc. Are you comparing one plane or the family?
Total rubbish.
You are not comparing apples with apples, Nicolas. The hashtag#Boeing hashtag#B737Max8 should be compared with the hashtag#Airbus hashtag#A320Neo. The true comparison would be between the hashtag#A220-300 and the hashtag#B737Max7!
You are not comparing apples with apples, Nicolas. The Boeing B737Max8 should be compared with the Airbus A320Neo. The true comparison would be between the A220-300 and the B737Max7!
Looks like USA journalism is imploding – really sub-world class article.
Absolute click bait nonsense article. Apples, oranges. Kiwis even. The writer doesn’t have a clue about commercial or operational considerations or metrics. Waste of my time and I’m wasting even more time writing this.
Apples-to-apples: A220-300 competes/compares to B737Max7. In that comparison, the A220-300 wins hands down, comfort, economics, technology, period.
This comparison is possibly one of the worst you can ever imagine people writing: more passengers = better? why don’t you compare A220s with 747s to start with when you are not comparing apples with apples right from the beginning
This page always benefits Boeing in this type of articles.
The 737-800 has a range of 2935 nautical miles, way more than what is depicted above.
Boeing builds a 737 in ten days and delivers almost 2 a day…
I guess I missed the many arrivals of 6 plus hour 737 flights.
THE CANADIAN PLANE WILL PROVE SAFER……… GUARANTEED.
No shortcuts……
I think more number of airlines will now order A220s after 2 tragic MAX-8 Crashes. Airbus helped Bombardier at the right time.
With the two last two crashes of Lion Air and Ethiopian airline I will say certainly the A220. It is more modern, more secure, better designed… I understand now why the US was putting 300 % taxes on Bombardier to prevent them selling their new plane, because the 737 Max is piece of crap.
Another WH propaganda article with no real aviation merit.The C series was started by Bombardier because Boeing had dropped it’s short/medium range due to 737 efficient production and operation making it viable in that market. By viable doesn’t mean a shoe in. That’s why Bombardier designed it’s more advanced c series. It was only due to agressive action by Boeing that forced Bombardier to conspire with Airbus to make it a legal competitor. The better ‘plabe just happens to be the c series, now the A220. Unfortunately, Airbus is marketing the A318 and A320 in the same market. I suspect… Read more »
“However, many airlines actually lease planes and may not care about how much it costs.”
Really? That’s like saying the lease payment for a Jaguar is the same as a Civic since they are both cars.
Your analysis does not include environmental impact. In addition to the far greater fuel efficiency of the CSeries, it is the quietest plane in its class. This is something that will be important for communities that surround airports and for airlines that want to reduce the noise footprint on those communities (or face stricter regulation of landing times).
I agree,
Very bias analysis towards 737 by simple flying… How absurd to give 737s a win cabin with 2x more middle seats (6 seat wide) over 5 seat wide?
How absurd not to also mention larger windows and larger lavatory and better passenger to lavatory ratio?
How absurd not to credit A220 for 2 inch wider seats saying it’s airline discretion?
How absurd not to declare in bold A220 as winner for fuel efficiency?
How absurd not to clearly identify in bold A220 Winner concerning landing and take-off length?
A complete bias analysis by simple flying… Lobbied by Boeing?