French Courts Rule Airbus & Air France Not To Blame For Air France 447 Crash

Magistrates investigating the Air France flight 447 that crashed into the Atlantic Ocean on June 1st, 2009 have exonerated both Airbus and Air France, citing pilot error as the cause of the crash.

Magistrates in France blame pilot error for the crash of Air France 447. Photo: Christopher Weyer via Wikipedia.

The regularly scheduled Rio de Janeiro to Paris flight was over the Atlantic Ocean three hours and 16 minutes into the flight when, at 02:14 UTC, it disappeared. Because of the 13 hour duration of the flight, including pre-flight preparations per Air France procedures, the Airbus A330 had three pilots on-board, a captain and two first officers.

As the captain, number two in the rotation, went to take his break, he briefed the two co-pilots and informed the cabin crew that they would soon be entering turbulence.


Air France 447 encountered a storm over the Atlantic

A few minutes later the aircraft encountered icing conditions with what sounded like hail hitting the plane registering on the cockpit voice recorder.

Flight 447 plummeted into the ocean from 38,000 feet. Image: Jolly Janner via Wikipedia.

As the planes, anti-icing system came on, ice started to accumulate on the pitot tubes that measure the aircraft’s speed. Per procedures, one of the two co-pilots (Pierre-Cédric Bonin) turned the aircraft slightly and reduced speed from Mach 0.82 to 0.80 as is normal when flying through turbulence.

At around 02:10:05 UTC with the pitot tubes iced up, the automatic pilot system turned off as it could no longer read the aircraft’s speed. Bonin took over the aircraft using the side stick priority button as the aircraft was being tossed around in the turbulence. During the next 30 seconds, the aircraft rolled from right to left as Bonin tried to compensate.


While doing this he suddenly pulled back on the controls raising the aircraft’s angle of attack which decreased the plane’s speed.

The aircraft stalled, plummeting into the ocean

By the time the co-pilot had negated the roll the plane was climbing at an unprecedented rate reaching its maximum altitude of 38,000 feet.

air france 447
Victims’ families to appeal against the ruling. Photo: Roberto Maltchik Repórter da TV Brasil, Wikimedia.

Now going into a stall with no reliable speed data the aircraft stall warning alarms went off, but it was too late to stop what happened next. Returning to the cockpit with the aircraft descending steeply to avert the stall, captain Dubois realized that co-pilot Bonin was still pulling the aircraft’s nose up.

Now with its engines still running but not enough airflow over the wings to keep it airborne, Air France 447 plummeted into the ocean killing all 228 people on board. Following a lengthy investigation, France 24 says that all charges against Airbus and Air France are to be dropped.

French Magistrates Nicolas Aubertin and Fabienne Bernard said that the accident was the result of a unique convergence of elements “which thus brought up evidence of previously unperceivable dangers.”

As such, they decided that both Air France and Airbus were not liable. In summing up they said they could not ascribe fault to the companies in what appeared to be a case of pilot error.

The judge’s ruling is an insult

The leading association of victims’ families called the decision an “insult to the memory of the victims”.

air france 447
A photo of the plane that crashed taken two years earlier in Paris. Photo: Pawel Kierzkowski via Wikipedia

A lawyer representing the victims’ families said an appeal would be launched against the magistrate’s decision.

“The judges have just written in black and white that the icing of the pitot sensors had nothing to do with the accident. It’s nonsense,” Sébastien Busy told Reuters. “If the pitot sensors hadn’t iced up, there wouldn’t have been an accident.”

The crash of Air France 477 was the worst in the airline’s history and brought up questions of pilot training after co-pilot Bonin acted incorrectly when the plane stalled.

Judicial authorities in France charged both Airbus and Air France with manslaughter but dropped the charges against Airbus, focusing instead on Air Frances failure to train pilots on what to do if pitot tubes malfunctioned.

Since this deadly crash, pilot training in France and several other counties have been increased and yet from what we have seen in the recent 737 MAX crashes it still requires more work.


Leave a Reply

6 Comment threads
8 Thread replies
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
10 Comment authors
newest oldest most voted

The case is somewhat misstated. The computer when it looses speeds (Pitiot Tube on 2 out of 3) reverted to alternative law (not none) What that means is you have lateral control and protection but not stall. The co pilot also put thrust to max as well as pull back (none of which is in the book) It took 4 minutes for the aircraft to hit the ocean., Until the very last seconds, no one looked at the interments and determined they had it stalled which it clearly was. As this was NOT Unprecedented, its was all to common with… Read more »

Wendy Richman

Sorry, but Airbus is responsible for this crash!


Why? Airbus wasn’t flying the plane. Is GM responsible for your truck crashing?

Gerry Stumpe

No. They are not. Aircraft was not defective.


Who trained the pilots? Or perhaps better put, who failed to train the pilots? Air France.


While there is a lot of issues and blame to be assigned, if a pilot goes outside their training, then its on the pilot. In this case there is no emergency at altitude that has the pilot pulling the hose up. None. Basics of the flying is that leads to a stall. What has been shown is that a significant number of piitots do just that. Others push the nose down (it has some logic though its still grossly nuts and wrong for the situation. Reality though is if your speed goes to zero at 35,000 feet, either the pitots… Read more »

Paul proctor

Wonder if this would have happened with Boeing’s control yoke, vs Airbus side stick controller. That to me is a major question. Somebody might have realized with yokes all the way back in their laps, the plane was stalling, or at least put the nose down.

Gerry Stumpe

Makes no difference. Side stick or yoke, the result is the same. There are incremental info on both systems.

Nate Dogg

The exact same scenario happened to Birgen Air 301, a Boeing 757, in 1996 so the answer is obviously not.

Carlos Rivera

Airbus is responsable..
WHY THOSE PITOTUBES GOT FROZEN???UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES THAT CAN HAPPEN….Sme with 737 crashes..Boeing is responsable for a deffetive system…

Carlos Rivera

And besides Airbus ix responsable…Airlines that departed before..avoided that storm…taking another route…diverting route towards the east…

Tobias Mattsson

How is it Airbus fault that the crew made the decision to fly through the weather?!
Please read Smokerr’s comments.


What total rubbish. Are these people seriously expecting us to accept their findings….. both AIRBUS n AIR FRANCE – are to my mind – at fault.

Gerry Stumpe

Airbus is NOT at fault. Their a/c performed as designed. When tubes froze up it released control back to the pilots who did not react correctly. They should have immediately powered up to 87% and lowered nose using rear airelons. THEN go to checklist to solve their problems.