How The Boeing 737 MAX Grounding Is Affecting Carriers

Just last week, certain airlines based in the United States announced that they will be extending their grounding of the Boeing 737 MAX to March 2020. This will put the aircraft out of action for up to a year for at least some carriers. The suspension has undoubtedly caused operational and financial strain on carriers across the globe.

Boeing 737 MAX
The combination of two fatal accidents caused the grounding of the 737 MAX. Photo: Boeing

Costly situation

Southwest Airlines and American Airlines are two of the operators that decided to schedule services from March next year. Incidentally, between the two companies, a total of around $1 billion has been lost due to issues surrounding the 737 MAX.

Dallas-headquartered Southwest has 280 737 MAXs on order, of which only 31 had been delivered at the point of grounding. Meanwhile, American Airlines ordered 100 units from Boeing, receiving only 24 units so far. Both companies have had to cancel flights, implement alternative aircraft, and revise future plans.

Advertisement

Southwest announced that it had delayed the retirement of its older 737-700 aircraft due to the saga. It also previously shared that its Hawaii expansion plans had been delayed with the crisis not being resolved. Additionally, American Airlines canceled 9,500 flights solely in the third quarter of this year thanks to the grounding.

Advertisement

Alternative solutions

Today, Flight Global reports that Utair has revealed that it is leasing more 737s as the MAX delivery dates are continuing to be postponed. The Russian outfit is set to receive four 737-300s in order to fulfill the gap left by its younger sibling. The firm’s general director Andre Martirosov states that Utair is facing financial difficulty, with the outlook for the industry in general looking to remain problematic.

Boeing 737 MAX Southwest
Southwest Airlines is one of the Boeing 737 Max’s biggest customers. Photo: Southwest Airlines

Meanwhile, Aviation International News reports that Middle Eastern carriers are also feeling the pain of the 737 MAX suspension. Operators within the region have ordered 400 orders units between them.

Advertisement

Regional problems

There have already been cancellations of these orders from certain airlines. Flyadeal became the first major low-cost carrier in the area make a cancelation, dropping its request for 30 of the airliners. In addition, the carrier’s parent Saudi Arabian Airlines went to Boeing’s rival Airbus and upped its order for 100 of its aircraft. This includes 30 A320neos, which were requested at the Paris Air Show in June.

flydubai has also expressed its frustration with the whole ordeal. CEO Ghaith Al Ghaith shared his disappointment, stating that the grounding is impacting its development.

“Without any deliveries of new aircraft and no visibility of the timelines, we will see our operating fleet reduce in size to what it was in 2014,” said Al Ghaith, as reported by Arabian Business.

“This is disappointing. If the grounding continues until the end of the year, we expect our performance to continue to be impacted.”

Boeing 737 MAX
The aircraft has been grounded since March this year. Photo: Boeing

Passenger uncertainty

Even when the 737 MAX is back in operation, airlines face the massive task of helping passengers feel comfortable flying on board again. Therefore, airlines will have to invest in strategies to support this.

United Airlines realizes the importance of this task and is preparing initiatives ahead of its introduction of the aircraft next year. The carrier is preparing measures for passengers to rebook their flight if it happens to be on a 737 MAX. Even on the day of the flight, they will be able to change their mind at no extra cost. Furthermore, CEO Oscar Munoz recently said that his company will be extremely transparent if a flight is operated by one of these jets.

European carriers are also feeling the impact of the grounding. One of the airlines that has recently spoken about these issues is Ryanair. The Irish airline says that it doesn’t think it will receive more than 20 over the course of 2020, rather than the 58 that it expects. Furthermore, it doesn’t think that it will have any units at all before March.

Ryanair, Boeing 737 MAX, Base Closures
Ryanair expected to receive less than half of its orders. Photo: Ryanair

Is there light at the end of the tunnel?

Altogether, the grounding has caused a global crisis for airlines. The issues won’t even start to resolve until the model is cleared to fly again.

A few days, Boeing said that it expects that the 737 MAX to be recertified by the FAA in the coming weeks. Meanwhile, the European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) says that it could be back in the skies by February. Until then, airlines will continue to try ways to cover their operations.

What do you think of the ways that airlines have been impacted by the Boeing 737 MAX groundings? Let us know your thoughts in the comment section

Advertisement

17
Leave a Reply

4 Comment threads
13 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
9 Comment authors
newest oldest most voted
Fausto Imberti

Why is Boeing’s CEO M. still free and not in jail? What about Boeing’s suppliers (indian and chinese)? Nobody talk of them..

Peter

With the exception of the current-model 777, I’ve reached a point where I’ve lost confidence in ALL Boeing aircraft.
The 767 was also OK, but is now on its last legs.
Everything else appears to be shoddy, dangerous junk.
I pity airlines that have to contend with having this stuff in their fleets.

Trent

Peter gonna Peter.

The Max was a profit driven mistake and should never have been produced.

The rest of their lineup is fine. All engine makers are having teething issues with their new engines. All new airplanes have been delayed behind their schedule.

Tell me more about their “shoddy, dangerous junk”.

Juned

Batteries issues on the dreamliner… Also a mistake that could have been avoided.
The best thing about this MAX issue is that it has exposed FAA and Boeing collision and wrong practice.

Peter

The 787 is an accident waiting to happen.
– First the battery fires;
– Then the shoddy workmanship from Charleston;
– Then the Boeing whistleblower report on the oxygen tank issue;
– Then the questions from Congress regarding the issue with the lightning conduction layer in the wings.

The 737 NG is riddled with pickle fork cracks…and now also cracks in “adjacent areas”.

The 747 and 757 were fine: I left them out of my summary because they’ve virtually disappeared from the scene at this stage, except for a cluster of 757s in the US.

Gnoelj

You forgot to mention the kc-46
HEY THIS IS AUTOFFILLING WITH PERSONAL DETAILS SHOWING EMAILS, SIMPLE FLYING YOU HAVE A SECURITY /PRIVACY ISSUE!!!!

SHAPES NOT Gnoelj

Trent

I mean, we could also add in the pride of Airbus, the A400M. 4.3 billion in overruns, 4 years late on first delivery, the 2015 flight test crash.

Peter

I agree that the A400M is a major headache. However, I don’t have to fly on it, because it’s not a civilian airliner. Same as the KC-46.

Trent

So Peter is cool with: 747, 757, 767, 777. I still fail to understand his issue with the 787. Yes, the Dreamliner had battery issues during its rollout. And they were addressed. During the A380 rollout, the EASA ordered them all checked for cracks which was described in an EASA issued directive saying “This condition, if not detected and corrected, may lead to reduction of the structural integrity of the aeroplane”. Quantas said the cracks were from “manufacturing defects”. Guess what, just like the battery issues in the Dreamliner, the issues got fixed and both are incredibly safe planes. The… Read more »

Peter

Thanks for discussing the battery issue 🙂
I notice that you ignored the other 3 issues that I mentioned with the 787 😉

Moaz Abid

What about the 787, the long haul aircraft? Ad what about the 747 and the 757?

David

This is hyperbolic nonsense. That said, Boeing needs to pay for what it’s done, and scrapping the Max would be the first step toward recognition of its transgressions.

Trent

I would guess that they are doing exactly that and its why there has been nothing but silence about NMA.

pats

With all the issues plaguing Boeing, why don’t they accelerate the 797 narrow body plane while their workers wait ?? I for one would love to see a new aircraft type certification instead of re-using 60 year old 737 antiquated design…

Peter

The last aircraft program that Boeing “accelerated” was the MAX…and we know how that turned out.

Trent

One would hope Boeing is spending its resources to fund a MAX replacement rather than a NMA.

chris

Im not gonna get on a flying coffin by Boeing.