Edit: This article has caused a fiery debate among our readers and the author has been accused of being both an Airbus employee and an Embraer employee. Whilst it would be great to be double dipping and getting paid by both, please understand that we endeavor to not be biased and write as fair articles as possible.
There has been a lot of debate recently in our comment sections about which manufacturer builds the better small jet aircraft, Embraer or Bombardier. In fact, with Airbus buying up the A220 program, and Boeing following in their heels with 80% of Embraer’s commercial jets, this market is ready to erupt.
Some airlines are wrestling with this question themselves, such as Qantas (who last year revealed that they are choosing between these aircraft) and Delta (who increased their order of A220 aircraft).
So why not compare the two headlining aircraft head to head and see which come out on top, the Embraer E190-E2 vs Airbus A220.
As many of our readers at Simple Flying work for both Airbus, Boeing, Embraer, and Bombardier (and many more are fans of the aircraft), if there are any mistakes please do let us know in the comments.
How will we compare these two aircraft?
As we have done with other articles, we will pretend that we are a airline that is deciding between the two aircraft. This means we will be looking at what makes economic sense and will generate as much profit as possible, rather than what is simply the best passenger experience, easiest for the crew to fly or just a prestigious brand.
Additionally, there are multiple variants of each aircraft. To keep this fair, we will be examining the following.
- Embraer – E190-E2 and E195-E2
- Airbus – A220-100 and A220-300
There is a smaller variant of the E2, the E175, however, it would not be fair to compare it with a bigger Airbus plane. Additionally, there are rumors of a further stretch of the A220 (dubbed the A220-500) but that places it into 737 competition territory (which you can read all about here)
Without further ado, let us dive in.
Embraer E2 family vs Airbus A220 family
|Seating, 2-class||96 (12J + 84Y)||120 (12J + 108Y)||108 (8J + 100Y)||130 (12J + 118Y)|
|Seating, Max (28 in seats)||114||146||133||160|
|Seat Pitch||31-38 in||31-36 in||28-36 in||28-38 in|
|Seat Width||18.3 in||18.5-20 inch|
|Length||36.24 m (118 ft 11 in.)||41.5 m (136.2 ft)||114 ft 9 in / 35.0 m||127 ft 0 in / 38.7 m|
|Wingspan||33.72 m (110 ft 7.6 in)||35.1 m (115.2 ft)||115 ft 1 in / 35.1 m span|
|Height||10.95 m (35 ft 11.3 in)||10.9 m (35.8 ft)||37 ft 8 in / 11.5 m|
|MTOW||56,400 kg (124,340 lb)||61,500 kg (135,584 lb)||134,000 lb / 60,781 kg||149,000 lb / 67,585 kg|
|Takeoff Runway||1,450 m (4,760 ft)||1,970 m (6,463 ft)||4,800 ft / 1,463 m||6,200 ft / 1,890 m|
|Landing Runway||1,240 m (4,070 ft)||1,412 m (4,633 ft)||4,550 ft / 1,387 m||4,950 ft / 1,509 m|
|Max. Payload||13,700 kg (30,203 lb)||16,150 kg (35,605 lb)||33,350 lb / 15,127 kg||41,250 lb / 18,711 kg|
|OEW||33,000 kg (72,752 lb)||77,650 lb (35,221 kg)||81,750 lb (37,081 kg)|
|Fuel capacity||13,500 kg / 29,760 lb||13,300 kg / 29,321 lb||38,875 lb / 17,630 kg||37,950 lb / 17,213 kg|
|Range||3,250 nmi (6,020 km)||2,600 nmi (4,800 km)||2,950 nmi / 5,460 km||3,200 nmi / 5,920 km***|
|Engine||2× Pratt & Whitney PW1919G/21G/22G/23G||2× Pratt & Whitney PW1500G|
|Thrust (×2)||19,000–23,000 lbf (85–102 kN)||21,000-23,300 lbf / 93.4-103.6 kN|
|Speed||Mach 0.82 (473 kn; 876 km/h) max||Mach 0.82 (470 kn; 871 km/h) max|
*** this fact seems to be wrong, as the physics don’t seem to make sense. We have contacted Airbus for clarification and in the mean time will not be using it in our analysis.
Already by looking above we can see that there are some very close calls, so let’s go into a bit more detail and see what we can discover.
From first glance, it looks like that Airbus has the Embraer aircraft beat. After all, Airbus has the slightly bigger plane with the A220-300 and thus must be better for passengers right?
Not exactly. Both the Embraer jets have more premium passengers than the A220-100 (12 vs 8) and only the A220-300 can match them. Everyone knows that premium passengers make more money from an airline, and four extra business tickets might be worth 10 economy tickets, if not more.
Plus, look at those default seat pitches on the Embraer aircraft, 31 vs 28 inches. Whilst we don’t want to dive into specific measurements (in literal inches), that little bit of extra room in economy would be a blessing for those over 6 feet tall.
Overall, the E190 has the A220-100 beat in terms of passengers. Whilst the A220 can carry a few more economy passengers (12) the extra premium passengers will easily mean more money for the airline. Plus more room on board for those economy passengers is always a nice comfort.
But if we were to include the A220-300 vs the E195, the larger A220 scrapes by with those extra 10 passengers (they both have equal premium passenger seats).
Winner: E190-E2 / Draw, depending on how you look at it
We know that the A220 has bigger fuel tanks than the Embraer but how does this translate into distance?
The A220-100 is smoked by the E190-E2 by a good 500 km. Whilst this might not seem like much, it can mean the difference between short-haul regional travel to international destinations. This is despite the A220-100 carrying far more fuel than the E190, and leads us to believe that the A220-100 is simply not very fuel efficient when compared.
However, if we compare the A220-300 with the E195 we can see that the fuel and bigger thrust does translate into longer distances. For whatever reason, the E195 drops the ball and get beaten by the A220-300 over a 1000 km extra.
If you are an airline looking for a versatile aircraft with good passenger capacity, then why not choose the A220-300?
Winner: Draw / A220-300 depending on how you look at it
How much do they cost?
The following unit costs for each aircraft can be found online:
- A220 Family
- A220-100: US$ 79.5 million
- A220-300: US$ 89.5 million
- E2 Family
- E190-E2: US$ 53.6 million
- E195-E2: US$ 60.4 million
As you can see, the E2 family of aircraft is far cheaper to buy than the Airbus Aircraft. However, Airbus does have a larger ‘production’ scale and thus might be able to drop the price. They might be able to drop the price by so much that they pretty much give the aircraft to you at cost… just like how Delta is rumored to have so many A220 aircraft on order.
Which is more popular with Airlines?
In terms of orders, the A220 is far more popular with almost double the E2 family of aircraft (537 orders vs 260 orders). But again, we don’t know if these airlines actually paid market price for these aircraft, or if they got a very special deal (perhaps when they bought some A350’s they threw in some A220’s as a bonus, wouldn’t that be lovely!)
Which is best?
After looking at all the various factors, it becomes clear that neither company is best.
The E190 beats the A220-100, but the A220-300 beats the E195. When it comes to technicals, I think we can agree that it’s a draw. But if you are looking to buy and want to get bang for your buck, the newer E2 range of aircraft might be just what you are looking for.
If you have enjoyed this article, be sure to check out our other comparison articles:
- Boeing 777X vs Airbus A380 (Very controversial)
- Airbus A330neo vs Boeing 787-9
- Airbus A321XLR vs Boeing 797
- Boeing 777X vs Boeing 747
- Airbus A220 vs Boeing 737
- Boeing 777X vs Airbus A350
- The one that started them all, Boeing 787 vs Airbus A350