The preliminary data obtained from the flight data recorder (FDR) of the crashed Ethiopian Airlines Boeing 737 MAX aircraft shows “clear similarities” to the crash of the Lion Air 737 MAX last October. This is according to Dagmawit Moges, Ethiopia’s transport minister. During a press conference in Addis Ababa, Moges stated that investigators will issue a preliminary report within 30 days. The report will give further insights into what happened to Ethiopian Airlines Flight 302.
Ethiopian Airlines Flight 302
On March 10, Ethiopian Airlines Flight 302 from Addis Ababa Bole International Airport to Nairobi, Kenya crashed only six minutes after takeoff. All 149 passengers and eight crew members onboard the aircraft were killed.
BBC reported that the visibility was good. Nevertheless, according to data provided by Flightradar24, the aircraft’s “vertical speed was unstable after take-off.”
The aircraft was basically brand-new. Ethiopian Airlines took delivery of it last November.
Lion Air Flight 610
Last October, Lion Air Flight 610 from Jakarta, Indonesia to Pangkal Pinang City, Indonesia crashed 12 minutes after takeoff. 189 people died in this crash.
This aircraft had reportedly experienced technical difficulties in the days before the accident.
During the 12 minute flight, pilots had issues with the anti-stall system. It is likely that a faulty sensor caused the problems. Data obtained from the FDR shows that the nose of the aircraft dipped uncontrollably, and that the pilots tried to point the nose up about 20 times before the aircraft crashed.
Although only preliminary data is available at this point, according to the Ethiopian transport minister both crashes were very similar. Both aircraft crashed shortly after takeoff; vertical speed was erratic during both flights.
Interestingly, the Seattle Times reported on Sunday that the safety analysis of the 737 MAX aircraft’s flight control system MCAS (Maneuvering Characteristics Augmentation System) “had several crucial flaws.” Boeing performed much of the safety analysis, while the FAA only reviewed the flawed data and certified the aircraft.
We continue to keep our readers updated as more details emerge.