Should France Ban Domestic Flights?

A group of French politicians is reportedly proposing a domestic flight ban. While the ban makes sense on some levels, is an outright ban really the answer? Simple Flying analyses the situation.

France Domestic Flights
A group of French politicians is investigating banning domestic flights in France. Photos: HOP! (top) | SNCF (bottom)

France has a fairly robust high-speed rail network. As such, politicians are proposing that domestic flights should be banned, encouraging people to take the train instead. Indeed, the railway is widely regarded as being less environmentally damaging. However, a complete ban seems quite extreme. Maybe there is another way, such as incentives, or additional taxes. Well, the Simple Flying team sat down and analysed some of the possibilities.

Why the ban?

Banning domestic flights is not a new concept. In fact, earlier this year Simple Flying reported that a group of Dutch MPs were attempting to ban Brussels to Amsterdam flights. The thinking is sound. A train can carry far more passengers and is less damaging for the environment.


Indeed, we decided to dig into some statistics from the Department of the Environment, Fisheries and Rural Affairs to illustrate this point. According to DEFRA, a domestic passenger flight for business purposes uses 0.25kg of CO2 per passenger kilometre. However, the comparable figure for rail transport is 0.04kg of CO2 per passenger kilometre.


If you look at the numbers, including the faff of the airport and connections to the city, it is actually quicker to take the train on some routes such as Paris to Lyon. Now, this, of course, may not be the case on some longer domestic routes.

France Domestic Flight Ban
HOP! is a major provider of domestic flights in France. Photo: HOP!

Incentives or tax?

There are times when a flight is either necessary or strongly preferable. Rather than imposing a blanket ban on domestic flights, the government could instead incentivise passengers to take a long distance train.


One great example could be incremental taxes. For example, for your first four domestic flights you pay the regular tax, then for the next ten you pay slightly more tax, then slightly more for the next ten, etc. This would make passengers question whether they really need to take a flight, while still allowing those who really need to, to fly. This also has the additional advantage that the extra tax could be allocated to environmental causes, such as offsetting CO2 emissions.

There is also the possibility of making the train more appealing. One idea, which would likely be unpopular with airlines, could be to offer a cheaper train alternative when searching for flights. Say you search for Paris to Lyon, the cheapest flight on offer is €51, however, a comparable train is available for €45. Not a huge saving, but if marketed correctly could potentially sway travellers.

France Domestic Flight Ban
France could incentivise passengers to pick the train instead. Photo: SNCF

Will it happen?

While it’s uncertain whether a bill to scrap domestic flights would pass, I doubt it is just around the corner. Any such bill would likely gain huge support from environmentalists, however, you would expect some opposition from the airlines it would affect. In particular Air France and its subsidiaries.

Personally, I think a different approach to an outright ban is the right way to go. What about you? Do you think France should ban domestic flights? Let us know in the comments!


Leave a Reply

4 Comment threads
3 Thread replies
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
7 Comment authors
newest oldest most voted
Chi Hou Tang

It’s about money. When air ticket is much cheaper than train, why should I take the train? Environmentally friendly is good, but when it comes to money, I doubt how many of them will take the expensive, slow and unreliable train rather airplane?

Michael Aldersey

Yes but the article here speaks about France and its fairly well established TGV rail network. For example I live in Lausanne and can hop on the TGV here and arrive in Paris 3h 40m later. A plane ride would take equally long or longer (train to Geneva, check in, wait, boarding and finally flight, taxi, disembarkation etc)

Regional flight however are still useful where decent train connections are non existent of in 3rd world infrastructure countries like UK.


I can understand their reasoning but I’ve one question? What if I want to travel from let’s say New York to Bordeaux? Normally I would buy my tickets from Air France and fly to Bordeaux with a connection from Paris. But with this domestic flight ban it will be impossible. So I will need to go to the train station with all my luggage to take a train to Bordeaux. It’s utterly nonsense.

Daniel Oldhouse

Aaaah! Completely agree. I work in Italy for a UK company. I have a few colleagues in France and my mum comes from there. One lives near Nice, Southeast of the country. He travels twice a week to Nantes and Brest. Flight connections are already tough enough! How can you even think about obliging him to go on a train??? When you have a country terrified by terrorism, with poverty levels rising, internal civil war, extreme right rising like it is, can all what politicians think about be flipping plane environmental pollution? I would like to remind to all… Read more »


There are DIRECT trains from Paris CDG to Bordeaux Central Station that took 3.5 hours.

So after you collect your bagages, you just need to go to the station within the terminal and board the train to Central Bordeaux. Sounds easy to me.

Obviously, frequency and number of destinations would increase overtime when the domestic flight ban come into effect to counter the lack of flights between domestic cities.

So more trains = more frequencies = lower ticket prices to help people get on board = better network and destinations.

Henrique Abreu Braga

Frenchies being Frenchies…


I think you should ban the ships first. They blow much more CO2 in the air than all planes together.